Sometimes the inaudible interlocutor is recognizable as the image of a tangible playmate, sometimes he appears to be purely imaginary. On the other hand, Michelangelo, or Wagner, or Shakespeare—except in his sonnets—remains for most of us personally remote and inconceivable. Persons and society must, then, be studied primarily in the imagination.
American Council of Learned Societies: It seems nearly or quite independent of that power of interpretation which is the starting-point of true sympathy.
Personal images, as they are connected with nearly all our higher thought in its inception, remain inseparable from it in memory. All social sentiments are altruistic in the sense that they involve reference to another person; few are so in the sense that they exclude the self.
Is not the nucleus of the thought an image of the sort just mentioned, some ghost of characteristic expression? I trust it will be plain that there is nothing fantastic, unreal, or impractical about this way of conceiving people, that is by observing them as facts of the imagination.
Every one, in proportion to his natural vigor, necessarily strives to communicate to others that part of his life which he is trying to unfold in himself. In order to see this it seems to me only necessary to discard vague modes of speech which have no conceptions back of them that will bear scrutiny, and look at the facts as we know them in experience.
It is, then, the personal idea, the man in the imagination, the real man of power and fruits, that we need primarily to consider, and he appears to be somewhat different from the rather conventional and material man of traditionary social philosophy.
Probably, if we could get to the bottom of the matter, it would be found that our impression of a writer is always accompanied by some idea of his sensible appearance, is always associated with a physiognomy, even when we are not aware of it.
Thus the sentiment of gratitude does not pertain to me as against you, nor to you as against me, but springs right from our union, and so with all personal sentiment. He served as its eighth President in Cooley swiftly progressed to associate professor status in and became a full professor If there is something in you that is wholly beyond this and makes no impression upon me it has no social reality in this relation.
Because there was yet no formal instruction in sociology at the University of Michigan, he was forwarded test questions by Franklin Giddings. In fact, thought and personal intercourse may be regarded as merely 97 aspects of the same thing: It is not an occasional practice, but, rather, a necessary form of thought, flowing from a life in which personal communication is the chief interest and social feeling the stream in which, like boats on a river, most other feelings float.
To be always sincere would be brutally to destroy this pleasant and mostly harmless figment of the imagination. Each person is immediately aware of a particular aspect of society: I am unable, perhaps, to call up any distinct outline of the features of my best friend, of my own mother, or my child; but I can see a smile, a turn of the eyelid, a way of standing or sitting, indistinct and flitting glimpses, but potent to call up those past states of feeling of which personal memories are chiefly formed.
If it includes the whole mind, then, of course, it includes all the persons we think of, all the society which lives in our thoughts.
It is precisely the act of intercourse, the stimulation of the mind by a personal symbol, which gives a formative impulse to the vague mass of hereditary feeling-tendency, and this impulse, in turn, results in a larger power of interpreting the symbol.
As used by Spencer they seem to me valid from a physiological standpoint only, and fallacious when employed to describe mental, social, or moral facts. I receive a slight bruise, have the breath knocked out of me, exchange conventional apologies, and immediately forget the incident. What are spoken of above as personal ideas are merely those in which the connection with other persons is most direct and apparent.
The judgment of personal character seems to take place in much the same way. It takes no intimate hold upon me, means nothing except a slight and temporary disturbance in the animal processes. The intentness with which a child listens to it, the quickness with which he learns to distinguish different voices and different indections of the same voice, and the fact that vocal imitation precedes other sorts, all show this.
Cooley attended the public schools of Ann Arbor and graduated high school in If it appears that the human mind is social, that society is mental, and that, in short, society and the mind are aspects of the same whole, these conclusions will be no more than a development of the propositions advanced in the first chapter.
Some believe that young children have an intuition of personal character quicker and more trustworthy than that of grown people. Even if the resentment were aroused only by symbols of other persons it would not necessarily be non-egoistic.Charles Horton Cooley: Concept of the Looking Glass Self Introduction Cooley was influenced by approaches such as Pragmatism and Darwinism.
Even though Cooley was germs of ideas, to be defined and developed by experience, becoming associated, or rather incorporated, with. Charles Horton Cooley was born August 17, in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
He graduated from the University of Michigan in and returned one year later to study political economics and sociology. He began teaching economics and sociology at the University of Michigan in and went on to receive. Charles Horton Cooley was a sociologist who wanted to better understand society and human behavior.
He believed that the influence of groups within. According to the American sociologist Charles Horton Cooley (), the degree of personal insecurity you display in social situations is determined by what you believe other people think of you. Cooley´s concept of the looking glass self, states that a person’s self grows out of a person´s social interactions with others.
The view. Primary groups are the first groups of individuals one is introduced to and are also influenced in their ideas and beliefs.
They are the result of intimate association and corporation. He argued that individuals have two different channels of life- one from heredity and the other from society. — Charles Cooley, Human Nature and the. Charles Horton Cooley: Charles Horton Cooley, American sociologist who employed a sociopsychological approach to the understanding of society.
Cooley, the son of Michigan Supreme Court judge Thomas McIntyre Cooley, earned his Ph.D. at the University of Michigan in He had started teaching at the university inDownload